Beattie, Donna Kay. (1997). Assessment in Art Education. Worcester, Massachusetts:
Davis Publications, Inc.
Mueller, John. (2006). Authentic Assessment Toolbox. Retrieved 3/3/2007 from
http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/howstep2.htm
Payne, Joyce. (2007). A Guide to Authentic Assessments. Retrieved 3/3/2007 from
htt://artsedge.kennedy-center.org/content/3337/
Shuler, Scott C. & Selena Connealy. The Evolution of State Art Assessment: From
Sisyphus to Stone Soup. Art Education Policy Review. 100(1) Retrieved 3/5/2007 from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=8&hid=105&sid=c02fe11b...
Stankiewicz, Mary Ann. (1999). Spinning the Arts NAEP. Arts Education Policy
Review. 101(1), 29-32. Retrieved 3/5/2007 from
http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=7&hid=105&sid=c02fe11b...
3 comments:
The three ways given to justify authentic assessment in this eLecture really seem to be effectvie ways to not only assess students, but to interest them in what they are doing. Students are being given the opportunity to improve their work in a way meaningful to them that will assist them in the future as well. Contests can really create a spark and portfolio development and exhibitions make students proud of their work and encourage them to put their best foot forward.
Your approach to addressing authentic assessment is developed and presented well. It is a great way to engage and motivate students in a more meaningful way.
Authentic assessment is a new concept to me. Ican see how your three example can get students to assess their own work and efforts.
Post a Comment